omniplan-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to omniplan-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceGives MCP-compatible AI assistants full, typed access to OmniFocus on macOS, enabling task management, project manipulation, inbox processing, and more via natural language.10021 npm1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to plan, capture, and organize work in OmniFocus on macOS, with tools for querying and managing tasks, projects, tags, perspectives, and session state.251MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceTransforms macOS calendar management into a conversational experience using natural language, allowing users to create, manage, and update calendar events seamlessly through an MCP-compatible client.331MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to connect to the OnTime personal workbench via MCP to manage tasks, projects, and goals through natural language, including creating sprint projects, logging progress, and querying workbench state in real time.1-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables comprehensive management of OmniFocus on macOS through 17 specialized tools for projects, tasks, and organization. Users can create, update, and filter items or navigate the interface using natural language via the Model Context Protocol.218MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI assistants full control over OmniFocus on macOS, including tasks, projects, tags, folders, perspectives, forecast, notifications, and review workflows.43MIT
TDQS
Scored across 22 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation on tasks, resources, assignments, dependencies, project info, or documents. No two tools have overlapping purposes; e.g., create_task and create_tasks differ in batch vs. single, and query_tasks vs. find_task serve different query patterns.
All 22 tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., add_dependency, assign_resource, create_task). There are no deviations or mixed conventions, making the naming predictable and intuitive.
With 22 tools, the server is slightly above the typical well-scoped range (3-15) but still reasonable for a project management domain. The count is justified by the need to cover tasks, resources, assignments, dependencies, project settings, and document operations.
The tool surface covers full CRUD for tasks and resources, plus assignments, dependencies, project info, and document management. Batched creation and query/find variants are included. There are no obvious gaps for core project scheduling workflows.