Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to omniplan-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Gives MCP-compatible AI assistants full, typed access to OmniFocus on macOS, enabling task management, project manipulation, inbox processing, and more via natural language.
      100
      21 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to plan, capture, and organize work in OmniFocus on macOS, with tools for querying and managing tasks, projects, tags, perspectives, and session state.
      25
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Transforms macOS calendar management into a conversational experience using natural language, allowing users to create, manage, and update calendar events seamlessly through an MCP-compatible client.
      331
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to connect to the OnTime personal workbench via MCP to manage tasks, projects, and goals through natural language, including creating sprint projects, logging progress, and querying workbench state in real time.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation on tasks, resources, assignments, dependencies, project info, or documents. No two tools have overlapping purposes; e.g., create_task and create_tasks differ in batch vs. single, and query_tasks vs. find_task serve different query patterns.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 22 tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., add_dependency, assign_resource, create_task). There are no deviations or mixed conventions, making the naming predictable and intuitive.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 22 tools, the server is slightly above the typical well-scoped range (3-15) but still reasonable for a project management domain. The count is justified by the need to cover tasks, resources, assignments, dependencies, project settings, and document operations.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers full CRUD for tasks and resources, plus assignments, dependencies, project info, and document management. Batched creation and query/find variants are included. There are no obvious gaps for core project scheduling workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues