Skip to main content
Glama
johnsarie27

joplin-mcp

by johnsarie27

Related Servers

Alternatives to joplin-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides standardized tools for querying and retrieving notes from Joplin personal knowledge manager through its API, enabling AI assistants to access and reference personal notes contextually.
      9
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A MCP server for Joplin note-taking application that enables interaction with Joplin notes through the web clipper API, supporting notebook hierarchy and running in Docker.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Joplin notes through MCP, allowing searching, creating, updating, and deleting notes via the Joplin Web Clipper API.
      3 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI assistants read/write access to Joplin notes through the local REST API, with 20 tools for managing folders, notes, todos, tags, and bulk operations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server to interact with Obsidian via the Local REST API community plugin, enabling file listing, search, content manipulation, and note management.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, and the descriptions explicitly disambiguate the tricky trio: update_note (full-body replace), update_note_section (targeted substring), and append_note_section (append). The listing tools (search_notes, list_notes_in_notebook, get_notes_by_tag) are also clearly separated by their input method.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (search_notes, get_note, create_note, update_note, delete_note, list_notebooks, create_notebook, list_tags, etc.). Suffixes like _section and _in_notebook are applied predictably, so names are fully readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well-scoped for a note-taking server, giving good granularity between note reads, writes, and structured edits. No tool feels redundant or out of place.

    Completeness4/5

    Note lifecycle is fully covered (search/get/create/update/delete plus section edits, todos, and tag listings). However, notebook and tag management is asymmetric: only create_notebook and list_notebooks exist (no update/delete notebook), and tags are read-only with no way to create, delete, or attach a tag to a note.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week