joplin-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to joplin-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that provides standardized tools for querying and retrieving notes from Joplin personal knowledge manager through its API, enabling AI assistants to access and reference personal notes contextually.9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Joplin Server that gives LLMs full access to notes, notebooks, tags, and attachments via the REST API.5MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA MCP server for Joplin note-taking application that enables interaction with Joplin notes through the web clipper API, supporting notebook hierarchy and running in Docker.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables interaction with Joplin notes through MCP, allowing searching, creating, updating, and deleting notes via the Joplin Web Clipper API.3 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI assistants read/write access to Joplin notes through the local REST API, with 20 tools for managing folders, notes, todos, tags, and bulk operations.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server to interact with Obsidian via the Local REST API community plugin, enabling file listing, search, content manipulation, and note management.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, and the descriptions explicitly disambiguate the tricky trio: update_note (full-body replace), update_note_section (targeted substring), and append_note_section (append). The listing tools (search_notes, list_notes_in_notebook, get_notes_by_tag) are also clearly separated by their input method.
Every tool follows a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (search_notes, get_note, create_note, update_note, delete_note, list_notebooks, create_notebook, list_tags, etc.). Suffixes like _section and _in_notebook are applied predictably, so names are fully readable.
13 tools is well-scoped for a note-taking server, giving good granularity between note reads, writes, and structured edits. No tool feels redundant or out of place.
Note lifecycle is fully covered (search/get/create/update/delete plus section edits, todos, and tag listings). However, notebook and tag management is asymmetric: only create_notebook and list_notebooks exist (no update/delete notebook), and tags are read-only with no way to create, delete, or attach a tag to a note.