Skip to main content
Glama
johnnyclem

hypervault-mcp

by johnnyclem

task_update

Update a task's status, progress, or notes on a board. Pass only the fields to change; notes append, metadata merges.

Instructions

Patch one task on a board — status, progress, a note, or any other field. Only the arguments you pass are changed.

Push every meaningful change the moment it happens: the user's board polls the same list, so a note or a progress bump is how they see you're alive and steer you before you go too far. note appends to the task's thread (nothing is overwritten) and metadata merges key-wise.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
noteNoA line to append to the task's thread — what you did, what you found, why you're blocked.
titleNoNew title.
parentNoRe-parent under this epic's task id.
statusNo"todo", "in_progress", "blocked", "review", "done", or "cancelled". Setting "done" also releases your lock.
projectYesThe board's project id, data slug, or URL.
task_idYesThe task to patch (from tasklist_get).
metadataNoKeys to merge into the task's metadata.
priorityNo"low", "medium", "high", or "critical".
progressNo0–100.
agent_nameNoStable, readable name for you.
agent_typeNoOptional agent family.
active_formNoNew present-tense label.
descriptionNoNew description.
expected_versionNoThe list `version` you're writing against — pass it whenever you have one.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations, so the description carries the burden. It discloses key behaviors: only passed arguments change, note appends, metadata merges. This is meaningful for a mutation tool, though it omits details like lock release or concurrency handling (which appear in schema descriptions).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two paragraphs, first sentence is a crisp purpose. The second paragraph is slightly verbose but earns its place by explaining usage cadence and key behaviors. No fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 14 parameters fully covered by the schema and an output schema present, the description need not enumerate fields. It provides usage context and critical behavioral semantics, making it sufficiently complete for the complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and parameter descriptions are detailed. The main description adds no new parameter information beyond repeating that note appends and metadata merges (already in schema). Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Patch one task on a board' with a specific verb and resource, and lists example fields. This distinguishes it from siblings like task_create, task_claim, and task_complete.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides strong guidance on when to use: 'Push every meaningful change the moment it happens' and explains why (board polls, liveness). It does not explicitly name alternatives or when-not-to-use, but the context is clear enough for a 4.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/johnnyclem/hypervault-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server