Skip to main content
Glama
johnnikolo

posthog-mcp

by johnnikolo

Related Servers

Alternatives to posthog-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with PostHog's product analytics platform through natural language, allowing users to manage feature flags, view errors, and access other platform features.
      25 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to PostHog to query events, persons, insights, dashboards, feature flags, cohorts, and experiments through the Model Context Protocol.
      13
      35 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with PostHog analytics platform, allowing users to list projects, create annotations, and search insights through natural language in Claude Desktop.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query self-hosted product analytics, investigate changes with evidence and coverage checks, and use optional management tools for saved reports, goals, and keys.
      20
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to explore a project's captured events and properties, then run trend, funnel and retention analyses and create or list saved insights. Tools are model-oriented, returning trimmed, budgeted results and actionable errors, with the project resolved from the API key or bearer token rather than passed as an argument.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct PostHog resource: feature flags, insights, persons, events, and trends. There is no overlap in functionality, making it clear which tool to use for each task.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming pattern is inconsistent: three tools use 'get_', one uses 'list_', and one uses 'query_'. Furthermore, 'get_insights' suggests a single insight but actually retrieves by ID, while 'get_feature_flags' returns a list. This could cause confusion.

    Tool Count4/5

    With five tools, the server covers essential read operations for a PostHog integration. The count is reasonable but slightly on the low side for a comprehensive analytics platform; it could include a few more tools.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is entirely read-only, missing create, update, and delete operations for all resources. There are no tools for managing cohorts, experiments, or dashboards, leaving significant gaps for typical PostHog workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues