tapatalk_get_latest_topics

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, covering safety. The description adds meaningful behavioral context by specifying that topics are ordered by date and span all forums, which goes beyond the basic read-only signal. No hidden side-effects are implied.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence that is front-loaded and directly states the purpose. There is no unnecessary verbosity or repetition. Every word contributes to the meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with only optional parameters, and annotations plus schema cover safety and parameter details. The description implies a list of topics as output, but without an output schema, a bit more detail (e.g., topic fields) could enhance completeness. Still, it is adequate for typical use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides full descriptions for both parameters (page, per_page) with defaults and constraints, so schema coverage is 100%. The description does not add extra parameter semantics, adhering to the baseline for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get') and the specific resource ('latest topics across all forums'), with an explicit ordering detail ('ordered by date'). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_topics, which likely lacks the global scope and date ordering.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies a use case for retrieving global recent topics, but it does not explicitly mention when to choose this over siblings like get_topics, get_unread_topics, or get_participated_topics. No alternatives or exclusions are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.