ravendb-mcp

initialize-connection

Connect to a RavenDB database by specifying the server URL and database name.

Instructions

Connect to a RavenDB server

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "server_url": "<server_url>",
      "database": "<database>"
    },
    "name": "initialize-connection"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`server_url`	Yes	The URL of the RavenDB server
`database`	Yes	The database to connect to

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedv0.0.1May 25, 2026

TDQS

C2.9/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It fails to mention any side effects, authentication requirements, idempotency, or whether the connection is persistent or one-time. The agent is left guessing about important behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded and concise. However, it could be slightly expanded to include critical information without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description is insufficiently complete. It omits return behavior, error handling, and connection lifecycle details. The agent would need external documentation to use this tool confidently.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Both parameters are described in the input schema with 100% coverage. The description adds no new semantics beyond 'connect', so it meets the baseline. No additional formatting, constraints, or example values are provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's action: 'Connect to a RavenDB server'. This is specific and distinguishes it from sibling tools that operate on documents or queries. However, it lacks any additional context about the connection lifecycle or what 'initialize' entails.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'select-database' or under what circumstances a connection should be initialized. The description does not mention prerequisites, order of operations, or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server