Skip to main content
Glama
john-walkoe

USPTO Final Petition Decisions MCP Server

by john-walkoe

Related Servers

Alternatives to USPTO Final Petition Decisions MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      High-performance server that simplifies access to the USPTO Final Petition Decisions API, streamlining document analysis and enhancing intellectual property workflows.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides access to USPTO patent and patent application data through multiple APIs, enabling search, retrieval, and analysis of patents, PTAB proceedings, and litigation data via natural language.
      42
      329 PyPI
      85
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and retrieve patent prosecution records, including full-text examination documents, examiner and applicant citations with AI/ML-enriched metadata, claim-level rejection data under 35 U.S.C. 101/102/103/112, and Commissioner final decisions on patent application petitions. It also supports raw-response passthrough for self-diagnosing upstream issues.
      139 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching USPTO PTAB trial proceedings, decisions, and documents, building proceeding timelines, and summarizing patent risk and party exposure, with filtering by patent, party, trial type, status, and dates.
      187 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and screen US intellectual property — granted patents with full claims, published applications, trademarks in every status, owners, inventors, USPTO documents, prosecution file wrappers, PTAB trials, and e-commerce product pages. Supports freedom-to-operate screenings, knockout trademark searches, and patent status/expiry/ownership checks through a single authenticated remote connection.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: search functions target different scopes (minimal, balanced, by application, by art unit), get_petition_details retrieves full details, get_document_content extracts text, get_document_download provides download links, and get_guidance offers contextual help. The descriptions explicitly differentiate their use cases, preventing misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent 'fpd_' prefix with snake_case and descriptive verb_noun patterns (e.g., fpd_search_petitions_minimal, fpd_get_petition_details). The naming is uniform across all eight tools, making them predictable and easy to understand at a glance.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for USPTO petition analysis, covering search (4 variants), detail retrieval, document access (content and download), and guidance. Each tool serves a specific role in the workflow, from discovery to deep analysis, without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage for the domain: multiple search options for discovery, detailed petition retrieval, document extraction and download for full access, and guidance for workflow optimization. There are no gaps in the CRUD/lifecycle for petition analysis, enabling agents to handle end-to-end tasks without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues