Skip to main content
Glama
john-ops-lab

EasySourceFlow

by john-ops-lab

easysourceflow_get_job

Read-onlyIdempotent

Check the status of a submitted job and wait up to 45 seconds for it to complete. Returns the generated Markdown summary once the job succeeds.

Instructions

Independently query an EasySourceFlow job, optionally waiting up to 45 seconds for a state change. If status remains queued or running, call this tool again with the same job ID; do not fetch or summarize the source with another tool. Only status=succeeded with result.summary_markdown is a completed summary. If the job succeeded, the tool returns final Markdown intended for direct delivery to the user; relay it verbatim unless the user explicitly asks you to rewrite it. For chat-card delivery, put the Markdown in the message tool's card.elements markdown content; do not send card JSON as plain message text.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
job_idYesJob ID returned by easysourceflow_submit_link.
wait_secondsNoWait up to this many seconds while the job is queued or running. Use 45 for agent polling.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses waiting behavior, state interpretation, and output handling beyond annotations; no contradiction with readOnlyHint or idempotentHint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Compact front-loaded paragraph; each sentence adds value, though slightly dense; could benefit from bullet points for clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Without output schema, description fully explains return value, success condition, and delivery method; covers polling and error states adequately.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%; description adds value by specifying origin of job_id and practical guidance for wait_seconds (use 45 for polling).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool queries an EasySourceFlow job with optional waiting, distinguishing it from submission and listing siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit when to poll (job still queued/running) and when to stop (status=succeeded with summary_markdown), plus clear instructions not to use alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/john-ops-lab/EasySourceFlow'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server