CVESentry MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to CVESentry MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceVulnerability intelligence for AI agents that enables CVE lookup, package vulnerability checks, and dependency auditing without API keys.5MIT

@4da/mcp-serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to learn, from locally read lockfiles, what changes between the dependency version installed and a target version, which of the user's files that upgrade touches, and which vulnerabilities it resolves. It also performs OSV-matched vulnerability scans, ranks upgrade plans, and stores decision memory, running entirely on the user's machine with no account or API keys.11394 npmApache 2.0- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to submit npm, PyPI, Go, or Maven packages and manifests to the free OSV.dev database and receive per-package and per-advisory results with CVE mappings, CVSS scores, severities, and the versions that fix each issue. It also supports filtering by minimum severity, de-duplicating alias advisories, and machine-readable error/warning rows for CI gates and upgrade recommendations.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceDependency security & health auditing for AI agents with no account or API key required.22MIT

Fetter MCPofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides real-time Python package vulnerability data, enabling AI agents to check CVEs, CVSS scores, and safe versions for informed dependency decisions.1-- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides security checks for AI agents, including secret scanning, CVE lookup, and dependency vulnerability scanning, all running locally except for CVE lookups.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a distinct primary purpose, but there is minor overlap: search_cve can search by CVE ID while get_cve_details retrieves full details for a CVE ID, and audit_manifest returns fix recommendations that overlap with get_safe_recommendation's single-package fix output. The descriptions still provide enough guidance to select correctly.
All four tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (search_cve, audit_manifest, get_cve_details, get_safe_recommendation). There is no mixing of conventions or verb styles.
Four tools are well-scoped for a local CVE lookup and remediation server: search, audit, detailed lookup, and safe version recommendation. Each tool earns its place and the set is not bloated or thin.
The set covers the core lifecycle: lookup by ID/package/keyword, audit a manifest, retrieve full CVE metadata, and get a safe patch version. A minor gap is the lack of a direct 'is this version vulnerable?' query, though agents can infer this from search_cve or get_safe_recommendation.