ynab-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to ynab-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides Large Language Models with access to YNAB (You Need A Budget) budgets, allowing them to fetch budget data including accounts, categories, and category groups.6-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects AI assistants to YNAB budgets, enabling natural language queries about finances backed by full API coverage and built-in YNAB methodology knowledge.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that allows users to interact with YNAB data, enabling access to account balances, transactions, and the creation of new transactions through the Model Context Protocol.86MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes the full YNAB API, allowing LLMs to read and manage budgets, accounts, and transactions through natural language. It features 49 specialized tools for comprehensive financial management, including category updates, money movements, and transaction tracking.47102 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for interacting with YNAB (You Need A Budget). Provides tools for accessing budget data through MCP-enabled clients like Claude Desktop.4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA minimal and auditable MCP server that enables local AI assistants to read and manage YNAB budget data. It supports operations like listing accounts, tracking transactions, and moving money between categories while maintaining user privacy.9MIT
TDQS
Scored across 27 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action (e.g., create vs list, single vs bulk, budget vs month). Descriptions clearly differentiate overlapping pairs like get/list and single/bulk transactions.
All tools follow the verb_noun pattern consistently with snake_case and the ynab_ prefix. The few exceptions like ynab_assign_budgeted_amount still adhere to the same pattern.
27 tools cover many YNAB entities and operations, but the count is slightly high. Some operations could be combined (e.g., single/bulk create transaction) without loss of clarity.
Core CRUD operations are present for transactions, categories, payees, and accounts (though account update/delete are missing). Gaps exist for scheduled transaction management and goal-related actions, limiting full lifecycle coverage.