A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceLightning Network trust oracle for AI agents. Provides real-time node reachability checks, trust scores, and personalized pathfinding for 17,000+ Lightning nodes via 12 MCP tools.
2 npm
AGPL 3.0
Maximum Sats MCP
by joelklabo
Related Servers
Alternatives to Maximum Sats MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform Bitcoin and Lightning Network payments using a non-custodial, zero-trust architecture. It provides 13 tools for wallet management, invoice creation, and payment processing while keeping node credentials local to the user's machine.139 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenancePersistent memory and payment safety for AI agents on Lightning. Enables agents to remember purchases, track vendor reputations, enforce budgets, and share trust signals via Nostr.229MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides a pay-per-query web search tool for AI agents via Lightning Network sats, enabling no-KYC, account-free searches through the MCP protocol.224 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Bitcoin Lightning wallet integration with LLMs through Nostr Wallet Connect (NWC). Supports lightning payments, LNURL operations, and L402 authentication for AI-powered bitcoin transactions.18 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceProvides a trust layer for AI agents with identity, reputation, payments, and discovery via 92 API endpoints as MCP tools, leveraging Nostr-native infrastructure.MIT
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 12 tools
Disambiguation4/5
The tools are mostly distinct with clear purposes, but there is some overlap in the Web of Trust (WoT) analysis tools. For example, wot_anomalies and wot_sybil_check both detect suspicious activity, which could cause confusion. However, each tool's description helps differentiate them by focusing on specific aspects like network patterns versus Sybil detection signals.
Naming Consistency5/5
The naming follows a highly consistent pattern. All Web of Trust tools use the 'wot_' prefix followed by a descriptive action or concept (e.g., wot_score, wot_trust_path). The non-WoT tools (ask_bitcoin, generate_image) also use clear verb_noun or action_object formats, maintaining overall consistency without mixing conventions.
Tool Count5/5
With 12 tools, the count is well-scoped for the server's purpose of providing Bitcoin/Lightning and Nostr Web of Trust services. It covers a broad range of functionalities without being overwhelming, with 2 tools for general Bitcoin tasks and 10 dedicated to WoT analysis, each serving a distinct role in the ecosystem.
Completeness4/5
The tool set offers comprehensive coverage for Nostr Web of Trust analysis, including scoring, network health, trust paths, and anomaly detection. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct tools for modifying or managing trust relationships (e.g., follow/unfollow actions), but agents can likely work around this given the strong analytical focus.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive