Skip to main content
Glama
joeexafionbot-dev

KOVA MCP

by joeexafionbot-dev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to KOVA MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • myUplink MCP Server

      kalmma
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects MCP clients (e.g., Claude) to your NIBE myUplink heat-pump account for reading sensors and controlling settings via OAuth2 authentication.
      1
      MIT

    • Rentvine MCP

      Rentor-CA
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides Claude and any MCP client with live access to property management data, enabling operations on properties, units, leases, tenants, work orders, vendors, accounting, and file attachments through natural language.
      25
      MIT

    • Home Assistant MCP Server

      mickpletcher
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop to read and control Home Assistant devices via natural language, with configurable safety restrictions on sensitive actions.
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The three tools have clearly distinct responsibilities: listing devices, reading state, and describing controller capabilities. However, the describe_capabilities description references 'control_light' and 'control_device' tools that are not present in the set, which could confuse an agent about which tool to use for control operations.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names consistently follow the verb_noun snake_case pattern: list_devices, get_state, describe_capabilities. The naming is perfectly uniform and predictable, with no mixed conventions or unexplained abbreviations.

    Tool Count3/5

    Three tools is at the low end of what would be appropriate for a smart home server, but since the tools reference dynamic, configuration-driven capabilities, the count is borderline acceptable for a discovery/query-focused surface. However, the absence of any control tools (referenced but not included) makes the surface feel thin for what appears to be a home automation domain.

    Completeness2/5

    The surface covers discovery and reading well but is significantly incomplete for control tasks. An agent can list devices, read state, and learn how to control systems, but then hits a dead end because control_light and control_device do not actually exist as tools. The capability descriptions promise actions the server cannot perform, creating a clear gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources