No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 5 tools
The tools are clearly separated by input type (URL vs HTML) and output format (detailed report vs raw JSON). The _json suffix disambiguates the output format, but analyze_url and analyze_url_json are conceptually similar, which could cause minor selection confusion.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case. The analyze_* prefix is used for testing actions, and get_rules follows the same convention, making the naming predictable and uniform.
With 5 tools, the set is well-scoped for the server's purpose of accessibility testing. Each tool serves a distinct input/output combination without unnecessary bloat, and the count is within the ideal range.
The server covers the core workflows of accessibility testing: analyzing URLs and HTML, with both human-readable and JSON output, plus rule discovery. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of customizable WCAG versions or screen sizes, but the essential surface is complete.
