exact-synergy-globe-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to exact-synergy-globe-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides a secure gateway to the Dynamics 365 F\&O OData API, enabling LLMs and MCP clients to query and manage entities such as customers, system users, and more.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for OData v4 endpoints, especially Microsoft Dataverse/Dynamics 365, enabling authentication, schema discovery, querying, CRUD, and more via natural language.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Microsoft Dataverse API with safe-by-default configuration. Works with any Dataverse / Dynamics 365 environment.2326 npm7MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to interact with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central entities, providing tools to get schemas, list, create, update, and delete records.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceHosted MCP server for Exact Online. Ask questions, pull reports, and prepare bookings you approve first.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible assistants to discover tables and fields, run bounded SELECT queries and saved BAQs, resolve dashboards, and search imported documents against Epicor Kinetic, without writing business records.4Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool addresses a distinct layer: connection/capabilities, entity and action catalogs, schema discovery, and record reads. The overlap between list_entities and list_entity_records is clarified by 'metadata entities' versus 'entity records', so selection should be unambiguous.
All tools share the 'exact_' prefix and use a consistent verb-noun scheme: get_ for single objects/schemas/info and list_ for catalogs. There is no mix of verb styles or casing.
Eight tools is a well-scoped size for an Exact integration. Each tool covers a distinct need without redundant or trivial additions.
The read-side surface is complete: server health, capabilities, entity/action discovery, schemas, single-record reads, and filtered list reads are all present. The only notable gap is that action schemas can be inspected but there is no execute_action tool to invoke discovered actions, leaving a potential dead end for action workflows.