homelab-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to homelab-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceSelf-hosted AI orchestrator that monitors and manages homelab services, exposing them as MCP tools for LLMs to drive.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA single MCP server that gives an AI assistant comprehensive access to manage a homelab, including SSH, Docker, Proxmox, Synology, Cloudflare, and more, with 85 tools and a centralized configuration.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI assistants real-time access to your homelab infrastructure. It enables querying node status, managing Docker containers, controlling Proxmox VMs, and inspecting OPNsense firewall state through natural conversation.2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA self-hosted MCP server for homelabs with ~193 tools covering media, home automation, productivity, infrastructure, and public APIs, featuring a web dashboard for configuration and health monitoring.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables local LLMs to manage a home media stack including Radarr, Sonarr, Prowlarr, and others.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI assistants control over your Sonarr, Radarr, Prowlarr, qBittorrent, and Jellyfin homelab media stack.6MIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but pairs like get_service_info vs explain_service_health and get_host_info vs explain_host_health could be confused since they cover the same entity with different details. The overview tools (homelab, infra, media) also have overlapping metrics but are scoped clearly enough.
All names use lowercase_snake_case and follow a verb-first pattern (search_, get_, show_, explain_, fetch_, refresh_). The two 'what_' tools deviate from strict verb_noun but are still clear and consistent in style.
16 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 well-scoped range, but the homelab monitoring domain is broad and each tool addresses a distinct aspect. The count feels justified rather than excessive.
The set covers most read-only monitoring needs: info lookup, health, overviews, change timeline, and refresh actions. However, what_needs_attention explicitly references get_pbs_status for backup checks, but that tool is not actually in the set, a notable gap. There are also no control/mutation tools, which may be intentional but limits the surface.