Skip to main content
Glama
jnot807

recruitee-mcp

by jnot807
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to recruitee-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Pandapé MCP

      Jairodaniel-17
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects Claude to the Pandapé recruitment API, enabling natural language management of vacancies, structured candidate review against custom criteria, pipeline stage updates, and CV downloads.
      14
      -

    • HireLab Screener

      nitinkumar-star
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to securely search, read, and update your ATS data — candidates, mandates, pipelines, tasks, and interviews — through natural language, with configurable write permissions and confirmation for actions like scheduling and emailing.
      -

    • zoho-recruit

      yogeshsraju-max
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to manage Zoho Recruit ATS operations including candidates, jobs, interviews, analytics, email, and AI-assist through natural language.
      20
      -

    • Recruitee MCP Server

      pepuscz
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables extraction and analysis of candidate profiles from Recruitee recruitment pipelines, optimized for LLM evaluation with clean, bias-free data.
      3
      MIT

    • MCP Recruiting Agent

      ingyukoh
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables multi-turn recruiting workflows by exposing tools to search jobs and candidates, fetch details, score matches, and retrieve policy, with guardrails against prompt injection and PII leakage.
      6
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    rt_search_candidates and rt_source_candidates both search the candidate database with substantial overlap; source is a superset with CV-text boolean search and rejection history, which can cause confusion about which to use. Other read and write tools are clearly separated by resource and action, making the pair the main source of ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the rt_ prefix and most follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_offers, get_stages, create_candidate, submit_evaluation). Two deviations exist: rt_offer_candidates is a noun-noun phrase rather than an action, and rt_source_candidates uses the domain-specific verb 'source' instead of a generic search verb, but the overall pattern remains predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is well-scoped for an ATS server: candidate lifecycle, pipeline stages, evaluations, notes, attachments, offers, search, and rating scale are each covered. No tool feels redundant, and none is missing enough to make the count feel thin or bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    Core recruiting workflows are covered: sourcing, creating candidates, moving them through stages, filing evaluations, adding notes, attaching files, and reading offer/candidate data. Obvious gaps are the lack of a candidate profile update tool and no explicit rejection/disqualification operation, but the design deliberately scopes set_stage away from rejection, and the rest of the lifecycle is well supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources