recruitee-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to recruitee-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceConnects Claude to the Pandapé recruitment API, enabling natural language management of vacancies, structured candidate review against custom criteria, pipeline stage updates, and CV downloads.14-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude to securely search, read, and update your ATS data — candidates, mandates, pipelines, tasks, and interviews — through natural language, with configurable write permissions and confirmation for actions like scheduling and emailing.-
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceConnects Claude to the Ashby ATS to manage the hiring pipeline through natural conversation. It enables users to browse jobs, manage candidate profiles, track applications, and coordinate interview stages.245MIT
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude to manage Zoho Recruit ATS operations including candidates, jobs, interviews, analytics, email, and AI-assist through natural language.20-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables extraction and analysis of candidate profiles from Recruitee recruitment pipelines, optimized for LLM evaluation with clean, bias-free data.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects your Ashby recruiting data to Claude, enabling natural language queries and management of candidates, applications, jobs, interviews, offers, and team information.16MIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
rt_search_candidates and rt_source_candidates both search the candidate database with substantial overlap; source is a superset with CV-text boolean search and rejection history, which can cause confusion about which to use. Other read and write tools are clearly separated by resource and action, making the pair the main source of ambiguity.
All tools share the rt_ prefix and most follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_offers, get_stages, create_candidate, submit_evaluation). Two deviations exist: rt_offer_candidates is a noun-noun phrase rather than an action, and rt_source_candidates uses the domain-specific verb 'source' instead of a generic search verb, but the overall pattern remains predictable.
14 tools is well-scoped for an ATS server: candidate lifecycle, pipeline stages, evaluations, notes, attachments, offers, search, and rating scale are each covered. No tool feels redundant, and none is missing enough to make the count feel thin or bloated.
Core recruiting workflows are covered: sourcing, creating candidates, moving them through stages, filing evaluations, adding notes, attaching files, and reading offer/candidate data. Obvious gaps are the lack of a candidate profile update tool and no explicit rejection/disqualification operation, but the design deliberately scopes set_stage away from rejection, and the rest of the lifecycle is well supported.