Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-server-codex

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible coding agents to execute the local Codex CLI as a coding agent, including code reviews, session resume/fork, and CLI diagnostics.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to spawn and control Codex CLI and Claude Code sessions on the host machine, with session management and filesystem access.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Grok Build to orchestrate the local Codex CLI for code reviews, adversarial reviews, task rescue, session transfer, and background job management through MCP tools.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Bridges MCP clients with local Codex CLI to execute autonomous coding tasks, manage threads, and inspect history via SQLite state.
      13
      577 npm
      4
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients and external AI supervisors to oversee and steer native Codex sessions through a thin local stdio bridge. It exposes eleven codex_* supervisory tools for tasks such as listing threads, starting turns, observing progress, steering, responding to approvals, interrupting, checkpointing, and rolling over work.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: starting, resuming, forking, reviewing, applying, listing, image generation, and job management are clearly separated. The session-lifecycle tools (exec/resume/fork) and job tools (status/logs/cancel) have well-defined boundaries with explicit descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the codex_ prefix and use lowercase snake_case, making the set predictable. The naming shifts slightly between verb-first (codex_exec, codex_list_sessions) and noun-first (codex_job_status, codex_job_logs), but the pattern remains readable and consistent in style.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well-scoped for a Codex agent server covering session lifecycle, background jobs, code review/apply, and image generation. Each tool has a clear purpose and none feel redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflows are covered: start/resume/fork sessions, review and apply changes, manage background jobs, and list sessions. A few minor gaps exist, such as no explicit job listing or session deletion, but agents can work around these without major failures.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues