Skip to main content
Glama
jmjeong

Whooing MCP

by jmjeong

whooing_update_entry

Update an existing transaction entry in Whooing. Provide entry ID, date, accounts, item, and amount to modify the record.

Instructions

Update an existing transaction entry in Whooing. Use whooing_entries to find the entry_id, and whooing_accounts to look up account IDs.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
entry_idYesEntry ID to update (from whooing_entries)
entry_dateYesTransaction date in YYYYMMDD format (e.g. 20260423)
l_account_idYesLeft account ID (e.g. expense category)
r_account_idYesRight account ID (e.g. payment method)
itemYesItem description (store name or item)
moneyYesAmount in KRW (negative for balance adjustments, 0 allowed)
memoNoOptional memo
section_idNoSection ID. Defaults to WHOOING_SECTION_ID env var.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only set readOnlyHint=false, so description carries burden. The description notes it is an update but does not disclose side effects, error states, or response format beyond basic mutation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences front-loaded with purpose, no wasted words. Essential information about companion tool usage is included efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 8 parameters fully documented in schema and no output schema, description covers the key selection workflow but omits what response or error behavior to expect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and descriptions are adequate. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond referencing companion tools, which is already implicit in parameter descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states verb 'Update' and resource 'existing transaction entry in Whooing'. Distinguishes from siblings like whooing_add_entry and whooing_delete_entry by referencing companion tools for finding IDs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance to use whooing_entries to find entry_id and whooing_accounts for account IDs, framing the prerequisite steps. Does not list explicit exclusions but usage context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jmjeong/whooing-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server