Skip to main content
Glama
jmars

memory-mcp

by jmars
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to memory-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • memory-mcp

      palimpsest-labs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Persistent knowledge graph MCP server with SQLite backend. Enables graph traversal, fuzzy search, temporal queries, and timestamps for entity management.
      12
      MIT

    • kg-mcp

      Kanne87
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A Knowledge Graph MCP server optimized for LLM context efficiency through compact JSON and SQLite persistence. It enables full graph management including node/edge CRUD operations, full-text search, and subgraph traversal.
      -

    • server-memory

      MK-986123
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server for durable agent memory using SQLite and FTS5, enabling knowledge graph storage, search, and recall for AI agents.
      20
      1
      MIT

    • l0-memory

      fabriziosalmi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Minimal long-term memory MCP server for AI assistants backed by SQLite FTS5 full-text search, optional hybrid vector retrieval, scoped memory graphs, and VSCode extension.
      1
      MIT

    • NL-to-SQL MCP

      SatyamRudrakanthwar
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling natural-language querying of SQLite databases via schema discovery, GraphRAG retrieval, and safely guarded read-only SQL execution.
      -
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: create/delete entities, add/delete observations, create/delete relations, search via token match vs fuzzy name match, open specific nodes vs read full graph vs traverse vs recent. The descriptions clearly differentiate similar-sounding tools like search_nodes and search_similar.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming predominantly follows a verb_noun snake_case pattern (create_entities, delete_relations, search_nodes). Minor deviations exist with 'recent' and 'traverse' which are single-word verbs, but they are still descriptive and do not disrupt overall consistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools, the server is well-scoped for a knowledge graph memory system. Each tool serves a clear purpose, and the count is within the ideal range for a domain-specific MCP server.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for managing a knowledge graph: create/delete entities, add/delete observations, create/delete relations, multiple retrieval methods (specific, full graph, traversal, recent, search), and fuzzy search. Update operations are supported via add/delete observations and create/delete relations, covering the full lifecycle without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources