analyse_file

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses critical behavior: the file will be shared with the community (public disclosure). This is a key transparency point. However, it lacks details on rate limits, authentication requirements, or what happens if the file already exists.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is relatively concise with an Args/Returns structure. Every sentence adds value, though it could be slightly more streamlined without losing clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description mentions returns 'The analysis report' but is vague about its format. For a simple upload tool, this may be sufficient, but more detail on the report structure would enhance completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has one parameter (file_path) with no description. The description adds 'Use absolute path', providing guidance beyond the schema. Schema description coverage is 0%, so description compensates well.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Upload and analyse the file in VirusTotal' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools that are read-only (e.g., get_file_report) by indicating this tool performs an upload.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage context is implied by describing the upload action, but no explicit guidelines on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_file_report for existing analyses). No when-not-to-use or prerequisite information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.