Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
ads-mcp-server

ads-mcp-server

by jmacaggi-gfm
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

get_meta_ads_report

Retrieve Meta Ads performance metrics with conversions filtered by META_CONVERSION_EVENT_NAME. Specify date range and breakdown by account, campaign type, or ad.

Instructions

Pull Meta Ads performance. Same shape as get_google_ads_report. Conversions filtered to META_CONVERSION_EVENT_NAME.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "date_range": "<date_range>",
      "breakdown": "<breakdown>"
    },
    "name": "get_meta_ads_report"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
date_rangeYes
breakdownYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only mentions the output shape similarity and a conversion filter, but lacks details on side effects, rate limits, authentication needs, or other behavioral traits. This is minimal disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two short sentences, each providing distinct value. It front-loads the key information and avoids fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description should explain the report contents. It mentions a conversion filter but does not list other metrics or describe the full structure. Relying on the shape of get_google_ads_report is insufficient without that tool's description being present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description should add meaning to parameters. It does not explain the 'date_range' or 'breakdown' parameters beyond their enum values, which are self-explanatory but not enriched. This is a significant gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The name and description clearly indicate this tool retrieves Meta Ads performance data. The verb 'Pull' is specific, and the description explicitly states it is analogous to get_google_ads_report, which distinguishes it from sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by comparing to get_google_ads_report, but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or any prerequisites. No exclusions or when-not-to-use information is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools