Skip to main content
Glama
jlivingston-Cipher

iamf-sentinel-mcp

by jlivingston-Cipher
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to iamf-sentinel-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • iso20022-bank-profile-mcp

      sebastienrousseau
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A fully local, closed-world MCP server that manages, validates, and serves bank-specific ISO 20022 clearing profiles and rule packs, enabling AI agents to discover profiles, fetch them, lint payloads against them, and validate rule-pack definitions.
      4
      1
      -

    • mcp-audit-server

      joepangallo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables security auditing for MCP configurations and AI agents, including prompt injection testing, data flow tracing, and security policy generation.
      16 npm
      MIT

    • mtl-c2pa-mcp

      musictechlab
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for reading C2PA content provenance manifests from media files, enabling natural language queries about AI-generated content, signatures, and provenance.
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: iamf_inspect provides orientation, iamf_validate checks conformance, loom_compile builds the packaging plan, and loom_explain justifies that plan. No two tools overlap in intent, even within the same domain.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the pattern {domain}_{verb}: iamf_inspect, iamf_validate, loom_compile, loom_explain. The convention is consistent and predictable, making it easy for agents to infer functionality.

    Tool Count5/5

    With only 4 tools, the server is well-scoped and each tool earns its place. The count is neither minimal nor excessive for covering the two core workflows (IAMF analysis and loom manifest compilation).

    Completeness5/5

    The server covers the full intended surface: inspection and validation for IAMF files, and compilation and explanation for loom manifests. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations within the stated scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources