Keshro MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Keshro MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server that enhances AI agents with tools for codebase analysis, task delegation to sub-agents, multi-agent coordination through chatrooms, and project todo management.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLocal-first MCP server that provides project context, verification gates, and structured tools for coding agents to discover knowledge, run diagnostics, and execute allowlisted commands within a repository.14 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceLocal-first MCP server that gives any AI coding agent per-project memory, workflow intelligence, and always-on, lossless token & context optimization.3713 npm6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides AI coding agents with AST-accurate, context-budget-aware codebase querying, safety gates, and team policy integration via structured tools and a local plugin layer.140 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceGoverns and audits AI coding agents via command gating, cryptographic logging, and multi-agent orchestration, exposed as an MCP server.16 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides a provider-agnostic MCP server that owns task claims, action logs, role handoffs, and health-gate results so AI coding agents can move work through use-case, spec, design, build, and review stages with server-enforced evidence. It also exposes read-only skills for drafting use cases and specs, triaging bugs, answering code questions, and auditing itself.29 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 25 tools
Tools are mostly distinct, with clear verbs like add, block, complete, start, unblock. However, 'create_plan' and 'generate_plan' may cause confusion, as well as 'plan_status' vs 'get_plan', though context may differentiate them.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., add_task, get_plan, list_projects). No mixing of conventions.
25 tools is on the high side, exceeding the typical well-scoped range of 3-15. While the domain is broad, the count feels slightly heavy and may include some redundancy.
The tool set covers task, plan, and project lifecycles well, but lacks delete operations for any resource, which is a notable gap. Update is present only for plans, not projects.