Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Jev Browser

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables frontier coding agents to delegate routine probabilistic judgments to TypeSafe Jev, providing calibrated triage signals for failures, attempts, completion, context ranking, findings, risk, and generic evidence-grounded questions.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language interaction with TypeSafe's Jev decision API, supporting mixed question calls, batch evaluation, model listing, and confidence or composite-score gates over stdio.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to call TypeSafe's JEV classifier and receive structured, typed judgments with probabilities for binary, choice, and scoring questions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server + Chrome extension that drive the user's real, logged-in Chrome over a local WebSocket. 59 token-efficient web-dev tools: compact element refs instead of screenshots, server-side table filtering, visual regression, accessibility/SEO/security audits, network mocking. Also runs on ChromeOS/Crostini.
      59
      206 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Browser automation MCP server that uses a real browser to give agents eyes and hands—open pages, click, fill, screenshot, and run scripts via accessibility-tree snapshots.
      22
      30 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only a single tool, there is no possibility of confusion between different tools. The tool's purpose is clear and distinct, and an agent can easily select it for any browser navigation task.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    There is only one tool name, 'jev_navigate', which follows a clean verb_noun pattern. Since there are no other tools to compare against, naming is inherently consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool is on the thin side for a browser server, but the tool is comprehensive, handling navigation, tracing, error capture, and screenshot generation. It is borderline but acceptable for a focused high-level automation agent.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool covers the core navigation workflow and returns extensive diagnostic data, but it lacks granular browser operations like clicking, typing, or extracting specific elements. Agents requiring fine-grained control would need to rely entirely on this one high-level action, which is a notable gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues