Jev Browser
Related Servers
Alternatives to Jev Browser
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables browser agents to make typed, calibrated decisions via Jev's System One model within Aside workflows, supporting choice, score, and noul questions with safe action validation.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables frontier coding agents to delegate routine probabilistic judgments to TypeSafe Jev, providing calibrated triage signals for failures, attempts, completion, context ranking, findings, risk, and generic evidence-grounded questions.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables natural-language interaction with TypeSafe's Jev decision API, supporting mixed question calls, batch evaluation, model listing, and confidence or composite-score gates over stdio.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to call TypeSafe's JEV classifier and receive structured, typed judgments with probabilities for binary, choice, and scoring questions.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server + Chrome extension that drive the user's real, logged-in Chrome over a local WebSocket. 59 token-efficient web-dev tools: compact element refs instead of screenshots, server-side table filtering, visual regression, accessibility/SEO/security audits, network mocking. Also runs on ChromeOS/Crostini.59206 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceBrowser automation MCP server that uses a real browser to give agents eyes and hands—open pages, click, fill, screenshot, and run scripts via accessibility-tree snapshots.2230 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only a single tool, there is no possibility of confusion between different tools. The tool's purpose is clear and distinct, and an agent can easily select it for any browser navigation task.
There is only one tool name, 'jev_navigate', which follows a clean verb_noun pattern. Since there are no other tools to compare against, naming is inherently consistent.
A single tool is on the thin side for a browser server, but the tool is comprehensive, handling navigation, tracing, error capture, and screenshot generation. It is borderline but acceptable for a focused high-level automation agent.
The tool covers the core navigation workflow and returns extensive diagnostic data, but it lacks granular browser operations like clicking, typing, or extracting specific elements. Agents requiring fine-grained control would need to rely entirely on this one high-level action, which is a notable gap.