CreateDashBoard

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits, but it offers none. It does not mention whether the operation is destructive, requires specific permissions, has side effects (e.g., creates a dashboard resource), or any rate limits or error conditions. The agent is left completely uninformed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but this is under-specification rather than concise efficiency. It consists of a single sentence that only restates the tool name. There is no front-loading of useful information; the sentence earns no place as it provides zero value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given three parameters, a nested object, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is woefully incomplete. The agent cannot determine required inputs, expected behavior, or return values. A minimal viable description would at least explain that it creates a dashboard and what the body fields represent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no parameter semantics. While the schema includes descriptions for 'region' and 'project_id' (overrides), the nested 'body' parameters 'title' and 'group_name' are undocumented, and their meaning is not clarified anywhere. The tool name implies creating a dashboard, but the description does not explain how the parameters relate to that operation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Huawei Cloud LTS operation CreateDashBoard' is a pure tautology that restates the tool name without providing any information about what the tool actually does. It fails to specify the verb's resource, action, or outcome, and offers no differentiation from similar sibling tools like CreateDashboardGroup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention any use cases, prerequisites, or exclusions. Given the large sibling list with similar Create* operations, the agent receives no help in selecting this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.