https://github.com/jkingsman/qanon-mcp-server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_post_by_id_toolB | |
| search_postsB | |
| get_posts_by_dateB | |
| get_posts_by_author_idB | |
| analyze_postB | |
| get_timeline_summaryB | |
| word_cloud_by_post_idsA | |
| word_cloud_by_date_rangeB | |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| qanon://posts/count | |
| qanon://authors | |
| qanon://stats |
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes: retrieval by ID, author, date, search, timeline summary, and word cloud generation. However, 'analyze_post' and 'get_post_by_id_tool' could cause confusion as both target specific posts, with 'analyze_post' implying deeper analysis but overlapping in core retrieval functionality. The word cloud tools are clearly differentiated by date vs. ID range.
The naming is mixed: some tools use verb_noun patterns like 'search_posts' and 'analyze_post', while others use noun_verb patterns like 'get_post_by_id_tool' and 'get_posts_by_author_id'. There's inconsistency in verb usage ('get', 'analyze', 'search') and structure, but names remain readable and descriptive overall.
With 8 tools, this server is well-scoped for analyzing and retrieving posts/drops in a QAnon context. The count is reasonable, covering key operations like retrieval, search, timeline summary, and word cloud analysis without being overwhelming or too sparse.
The tool surface is largely complete for a read-only analysis server, covering retrieval by various criteria, search, timeline summaries, and word cloud generation. A minor gap is the lack of update or delete operations, but given the domain (likely analyzing historical data), this is acceptable, and agents can work around it effectively.