list_recent_editions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the ordering (newest first) and output fields, but does not discuss any behavioral traits such as rate limits, authorization needs, or potential side effects. For a read-only list operation, this is adequate but minimally transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, efficiently front-loaded with the purpose: 'List the most recently published Diario Oficial editions (newest first).' Every sentence adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no parameters and an existing output schema. The description covers the essential output fields, ordering, and usage context, making it complete for the agent to understand and invoke correctly alongside sibling tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so the description compensates by detailing the output fields (number, type, date) and the date format (dd/MM/yyyy). This adds semantic value beyond the schema, aligning with the baseline of 4 for zero-parameter tools.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'list' and the resource 'recently published Diario Oficial editions', with specific output fields (number, type, date) and ordering (newest first). It distinguishes from sibling download tools by positioning itself as a discovery step before downloading.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit context with 'Use this to discover what is available before downloading', indicating when to use this tool versus the download siblings. However, it lacks explicit when-not-to-use guidance or alternative conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.