run_cell
Run a specific cell in a Jupyter notebook by its index to execute code or update output.
Instructions
Run a specific cell by its index
Args:
index: The index of the cell to runInput Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| index | Yes |
Run a specific cell in a Jupyter notebook by its index to execute code or update output.
Run a specific cell by its index
Args:
index: The index of the cell to run| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| index | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must cover behavior. Only states 'run' without disclosing side effects, state changes, error handling, or cell execution environment.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Short description with docstring, but the docstring is redundant with schema. Could be more efficient by merging or removing redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Missing output schema and context on cell state, validation, or error propagation. For a 1-param tool with many siblings, more context on cell execution lifecycle is needed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage 0% and description only restates schema ('index: The index of the cell to run'). Adds no extra meaning like valid range, format, or edge cases.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states action ('Run') and resource ('specific cell') with parameter 'index'. Distinguishes from sibling tools like edit_cell_content and run_all_cells.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives like run_all_cells or insert_and_execute_cell. No when-not clauses or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jjsantos01/jupyter-notebook-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server