Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
LeetCode MCP Server

LeetCode MCP Server

by jinzcdev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

get_problem_solution

Retrieves a community solution article's full content using its topicId. Returns article text, author, and metadata.

Instructions

Retrieves full content of a community solution article (read-only, no auth). Requires topicId from list_problem_solutions. Returns article text, author, and metadata as JSON. Use list_problem_solutions first to discover solutions and obtain topicId.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "topicId": "<topicId>"
    },
    "name": "get_problem_solution"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
topicIdYesSolution topicId from list_problem_solutions response

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.4.0
  2. Removedv1.4.0
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description fully covers behavioral traits: read-only, no authentication, and return format (JSON with text, author, metadata).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences, front-loaded with purpose and safety, no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Complete for a simple retrieval tool with one parameter and no output schema; mentions return fields and prerequisite step. Could specify error cases, but not required.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, baseline 3. The description adds value by explaining the topicId's origin from list_problem_solutions, which is not in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Retrieves full content of a community solution article' with specific verb and resource. It is unambiguous and needs no sibling differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs to first use list_problem_solutions to obtain topicId, providing clear prerequisite and sequential usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools