Skip to main content
Glama
jinwei233

emacs-runtime-mcp

by jinwei233

Related Servers

Alternatives to emacs-runtime-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      It enables local MCP clients to interact with the live Positron R or Python session, supporting variable inspection, silent evaluation, and state-changing execution.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables secure discovery and invocation of sandboxed filesystem, repository inspection, and utility tools through a unified MCP client with schema validation, timeouts, and execution traces.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      LocalBridge MCP is a bridge between an online AI chats and your computer. Most online AI chats can reason, and write code, but they normally cannot touch the local files, terminals, and scripts that make real work happen. This gives a trusted assistant a controlled doorway into a machine you own, so it can inspect files, edit text, search a project, run tests, use Git, and operate a shell.
      17
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to expose and control local and self-hosted tools via MCP, with isolated workers, long-running task management, persisted state, and modular integrations for reverse engineering and development workflows.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables live runtime inspection of any Python application, allowing MCP clients to query state, evaluate expressions, inspect objects, and read source code while the app runs.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of selecting the wrong one. Its purpose—evaluating a single Emacs Lisp form—is unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The single name 'emacs_eval' follows a clear namespace_verb convention in snake_case, which is readable and predictable. With only one tool there is no pattern to verify against, so it cannot be judged fully consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool is thin for a server whose stated scope is an Emacs runtime. It earns its place, but the surface is minimal enough that agents will hit its limits quickly.

    Completeness3/5

    Evaluation of one form at a time is functional but leaves notable gaps: no batch evaluation, no file loading or buffer inspection, and no way to explore server state. The core operation exists, but the surrounding lifecycle is largely absent.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues