Skip to main content
Glama
jinen-project

Agent Action Preflight v1

by jinen-project
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Agent Action Preflight v1

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ReproGate

      adimalkar
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables action-bound authorization and verifiable evidence contracts for MCP tool execution, offering deterministic action planning, policy decisions, and one-use capability tokens tied to exact action envelopes.
      3
      Apache 2.0

    • Dvarapala

      demolished-lab
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides permission gates and tamper-evident audit logging for AI agent tool executions, with declarative policies, consent ladders, and hash-chained verification.
      MIT

    • Proof Layer MCP

      World-999-Labs
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides cryptographic governance receipts for AI agents, enabling pre-execution evaluation and signed verdicts (EXECUTE/BLOCK/REVIEW/SHADOW) with offline-verifiable audit trails.
      MIT
    • Verax by verax-ai

      Veraxofficial

      verax-ai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-speaking agents to execute tool calls through an authorization gate, producing signed decision records and reconciled effect rows for accountability.
      6
      Apache 2.0

    • io.github.oleg-vdv/kepil

      oleg-vdv
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to execute actions under an accountability layer with identity passports, mandates, a permission gate, and a tamper-evident journal, while requiring human confirmation for irreversible operations.
      7
      3
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no risk of overlapping purposes or misselection. The single tool's responsibility is clearly unique by default.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The sole tool name follows a verb_object pattern (execute_preflighted_note) and there are no mixed conventions to penalize.

    Tool Count3/5

    A one-tool server feels thin for an 'Agent Action Preflight' scope, though the tool itself is non-trivial and narrowly focused.

    Completeness2/5

    Only an execute-with-preflight operation is exposed; agents have no way to inspect current configuration, separate preflight from execution, or recover from failed writes, creating significant gaps.

    Resources