A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceEnables AI assistants to create, manage, and break down tasks into subtasks with priorities, and track progress through a hierarchical task list.
11 npm
13
GPL 3.0
MCP Task Management Server
by jimfisher
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Task Management Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage tasks with tools for adding, completing, and deleting tasks, and resources for viewing all or pending tasks.3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage tasks with full lifecycle support including due dates, priorities, tags, subtasks, and project lists via 19 SQLite-backed MCP tools.4-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage tasks through a comprehensive interface with 8 tools for creating, updating, searching, and tracking tasks with priorities, categories, and due dates. Features persistent file-based storage, advanced filtering, and task statistics for complete task management workflow.8-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables natural language task management: capture, edit, complete, and search tasks with duplicate detection and citation-backed answers.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Google Tasks, including listing, creating, updating, deleting, and completing tasks via the Google Tasks API.39 npmMIT
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 17 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: tasks, groups, statuses, references, and bulk operations are clearly separated. No two tools overlap in purpose, and the singular vs. bulk distinction is explicit.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools use a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, with 'bulk_' prefixed for batch operations. This makes the tool set highly predictable and easy to navigate.
Tool Count4/5
With 17 tools, the server covers tasks, groups, statuses, references, and bulk operations comprehensively. While slightly above the ideal 10-15 range, the count is justified by the broad domain and no tools seem redundant.
Completeness4/5
The task lifecycle (CRUD), references, and bulk operations are fully covered. Minor gaps include missing update operations for groups and statuses (e.g., rename group, change status metadata), but these can be worked around.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues