Skip to main content
Glama
jim-agent

NEAR DeFi Dashboard

by jim-agent
README.md
# MCP Server: NEAR DeFi Dashboard

An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that provides Claude with real-time NEAR DeFi data, enabling intelligent yield recommendations, portfolio analysis, and swap routing.

## Features

- **DeFi Yields**: Real-time APY data from Ref Finance, Burrow, Meta Pool, and Linear Protocol
- **Staking Comparison**: Compare native staking vs liquid staking vs DeFi yields
- **Swap Routing**: Find optimal token swap routes on Ref Finance
- **Lending Rates**: Current supply/borrow rates on Burrow
- **IL Calculator**: Impermanent loss calculator for LP positions

## Installation

```bash
npm install @near-mcp/defi-dashboard
```

Or run directly:

```bash
npx @near-mcp/defi-dashboard
```

## Claude Desktop Configuration

Add to your Claude Desktop config:

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "near-defi": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["@near-mcp/defi-dashboard"]
    }
  }
}
```

## Available Tools

### 1. `get_defi_yields`

Get current APY across all major NEAR DeFi protocols.

**Example Conversation:**
```
User: What are the best yields on NEAR right now?
Claude: [uses get_defi_yields] 

Here are the top yields on NEAR DeFi:

1. Ref Finance NEAR-USDC LP: 25% APY ($2.5M TVL) - Medium risk
2. Meta Pool stNEAR: 9.5% APY ($15M TVL) - Low risk
3. Linear LiNEAR: 9.2% APY ($12M TVL) - Low risk
4. Burrow Supply USDT: 5.2% APY - Low risk
```

**Input:**
```json
{
  "min_apy": 5,
  "max_risk": "medium",
  "type": "all"
}
```

### 2. `compare_staking_options`

Compare different ways to earn yield on NEAR.

**Example Conversation:**
```
User: I have 1000 NEAR, what should I do with it?
Claude: [uses compare_staking_options with amount="1000"]

Here's a comparison for your 1000 NEAR over 1 year:

| Option | APY | Return | Risk |
|--------|-----|--------|------|
| Native Staking | 9.8% | 98 NEAR | Low |
| stNEAR | 9.5% | 95 NEAR | Low |
| LP (NEAR-USDC) | 25% | 250 NEAR | Medium |

Recommendation: For 1000+ NEAR, consider splitting: 50% native, 30% liquid, 20% DeFi.
```

### 3. `find_best_swap_route`

Find optimal swap routes on Ref Finance.

**Example:**
```json
{
  "from_token": "wrap.near",
  "to_token": "usdt.tether-token.near",
  "amount": "100"
}
```

**Output:**
```json
{
  "route": "wrap.near → usdt.tether-token.near",
  "expected_output": "450.123456",
  "price_impact": "0.10%",
  "fees": "0.3%"
}
```

### 4. `get_lending_rates`

Get Burrow lending protocol rates.

**Example Conversation:**
```
User: What are the lending rates on Burrow?
Claude: [uses get_lending_rates]

Current Burrow rates:
- NEAR: 3.5% supply / 8.2% borrow (45% utilized)
- USDT: 5.2% supply / 12.1% borrow (62% utilized)
- USDC: 4.8% supply / 11.5% borrow (58% utilized)
```

### 5. `calculate_impermanent_loss`

Calculate IL for LP positions.

**Example:**
```json
{
  "token_a": "NEAR",
  "token_b": "USDC",
  "price_change_pct": 50,
  "initial_value_usd": 1000
}
```

**Output:**
```json
{
  "impermanent_loss": "2.02%",
  "value_if_held": "$750.00",
  "value_as_lp": "$734.85",
  "loss_vs_holding": "$15.15"
}
```

## Data Sources

- **Ref Finance**: DEX pools, liquidity, swap rates
- **Burrow**: Lending/borrowing rates
- **Meta Pool**: stNEAR staking stats
- **Linear Protocol**: LiNEAR staking stats

## Caching

Data is cached for 5 minutes to avoid rate limiting. The cache automatically refreshes on expiry.

## Development

```bash
npm install
npm run build
npm start
```

## License

MIT

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Scored across 5 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Each tool targets a distinct DeFi operation (yields, staking comparison, swaps, lending rates, IL). However, get_defi_yields and get_lending_rates both return yield-type information, which could cause minor confusion.

Naming Consistency4/5

The naming follows a consistent get_/compare_/find_/calculate_ verb pattern, mostly noun_phrases with clear intent. The slight mix of 'get' vs 'compare/find/calculate' is minor and still predictable.

Tool Count5/5

5 tools is well-scoped for a NEAR DeFi dashboard covering yields, staking, swaps, lending, and LP risk. No redundant tools and the count feels right for the purpose.

Completeness3/5

The tools cover key DeFi decision-making areas, but lack obvious operations like portfolio tracking, historical yields, or transaction execution. Some overlap exists between yields and lending rates, but the core dashboard needs are mostly addressed.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues