obsidian_search
Search Obsidian vault for Markdown notes and retrieve relevant snippets based on your query.
Instructions
搜索 Obsidian vault 内 Markdown 笔记,返回少量片段。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | ||
| query | Yes |
Search Obsidian vault for Markdown notes and retrieve relevant snippets based on your query.
搜索 Obsidian vault 内 Markdown 笔记,返回少量片段。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | ||
| query | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description hints at returning 'a few snippets' but does not specify format, pagination, or limits beyond schema default. Minimal behavioral disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Very short and front-loaded with the key verb. However, it is arguably too terse; could include more context without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, no annotations, limited parameter info. Description fails to cover return format, error behavior, or use cases, leaving significant gaps for a search tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, but description adds no explanation for parameters 'query' or 'limit' beyond what schema provides. Agent must rely on parameter names and defaults.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it searches Obsidian vault Markdown notes and returns snippets. Verb 'search' is specific and distinct from sibling tools like obsidian_open_note, but lacks explicit differentiation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like obsidian_open_note or obsidian_recent_memories. Agent must infer usage from context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jijiutong/xiaozhi-desktop-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server