Skip to main content
Glama
jiezeng2004-design

PatchWarden

by jiezeng2004-design
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to PatchWarden

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Kontrol

      B-A-M-N
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP server that enables AI coding agents to read, edit, search, and run code in local projects with human review loops and policy controls.
      MIT

    • universal-mcp-fs

      Prabhas125
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A secure local MCP server that provides AI assistants controlled filesystem access and command execution with an interactive approval system for dangerous actions.
      17
      18 npm
      MIT

    • projscan

      abhiyoheswaran1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides AI coding agents with AST-accurate, context-budget-aware codebase querying, safety gates, and team policy integration via structured tools and a local plugin layer.
      394 npm
      4
      MIT

    • worker-mcp

      noosxe
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables a coordinator AI agent to spawn, control, and supervise local coding agents with interactive gating for high-risk operations.
      10
      18 npm
      MIT

    • anchor-mcp

      thewillmoss
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A portable MCP server that provides a shared persistent working state for AI coding agents, managing tasks, plans, notepads, memory, and project rules across different tools like Claude Code, OpenCode, and Cursor.
      6
      12 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 71 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools serve near-identical purposes with subtle differences (e.g., get_task_status, get_task_progress, get_task_summary, safe_status, safe_result) or are distinguished only by output verbosity. The safe_* family duplicates many base tools, and release_check/release_verify/check_release_gate overlap heavily, making selection confusing.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_tasks, create_goal, release_prepare), and the safe_ prefix is used consistently. Minor deviations include bare mkdir, sync_file, and versioned tags in descriptions, but overall naming is predictable.

    Tool Count1/5

    71 tools is an extreme count for any MCP server, even a comprehensive one. This is well beyond the 15-tool 'well-scoped' threshold and qualifies as overbuilt per the calibration.

    Completeness4/5

    Despite the excessive size, the server covers task lifecycle (create/cancel/retry/audit), goal management, release gates, worktree isolation, and direct session editing. The main gaps are lack of task update/delete and goal deletion, but the surface is otherwise comprehensive for its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources