F
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceEnables automated labor and service contract risk review through MCP, supporting single or batch contract analysis, risk knowledge base queries, and regional regulation lookups.
-
jev-legal-clause-mcp
by jiawei686
Related Servers
Alternatives to jev-legal-clause-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to paste contracts, leases, terms of service, and other documents to receive a plain-English summary of key risks, deadlines, rights, and negotiation points.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables extracting explicitly stated contract metadata, clauses, and obligations from user-supplied contract text without storing or modifying the data.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAnalyzes contracts for safety score and risk assessment, identifying dangerous clauses and dispute patterns, with recommendations for improvements.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAnalyzes financial contract PDFs to extract clauses, flag risk terms, and compare contract versions, producing structured risk briefs for legal and risk teams.-
decomposeofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceClassifies text into structured semantic units with authority, risk, and attention scores. Enables deterministic preprocessing for AI agents to filter and route content without using an LLM.10MIT
TDQS
A4.2/5.0
Scored across 1 tool
Disambiguation5/5
With only a single tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool. The purpose is unambiguous and clearly described.
Naming Consistency5/5
The tool name flag_clauses follows a clear verb_noun convention. Even with only one tool, the name is descriptive, consistent, and easy to predict.
Tool Count2/5
A single tool feels extremely thin for an MCP server. While specialized, the server would benefit from additional tools such as batch processing, clause list retrieval, or analysis history to justify its existence as a server.
Completeness3/5
The core flagging operation is present and functional, but the surface is minimal. There are notable gaps such as no way to retrieve past analyses, no configuration of risk categories, and no multi-clause or document-level handling, which limits agent workflows.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues