Skip to main content
Glama
jianghua-developer

bridge-mcp-server

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
BRIDGENoPATH 上的 bridge 命令,作为 BRIDGE_EXE 的备选。
BRIDGE_EXENo桥可执行文件路径(dist/bridge),用于多端链。若不设置,多端工具将报错。
BRIDGE_MCP_CACHENo单端克隆缓存根目录。~/.cache/bridge-mcp-server

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}
logging
{}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
list_templatesB

单端候选菜单(L1):离线读注册表过滤,kind/stack/form 可选(子串匹配; 受控值/同义词见 templates://catalog 词表提示)。

get_template_paramsD

单端参数内省 = 落参与选择地基:clone 底座读 params.json 两区(native/derived/selection)。

generate_singleB

单端直生成:clone → 读协议 → spec 校验 → copier copy(零注册,target_dir 须为空/不存在)。

list_combosD

多端菜单(L1/L2 地基):units/edges + 合并 selection(经桥 list-combos)。

get_combo_paramsC

多端参数基线(经桥 show-combo):params(可问)/ internal(勿传)/ derived(只读)/ selection。

generate_multiC

多端组合生成(shell-out 桥 generate):combo 须在注册表内,params ⊆ 原生参数集。

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription
generate_project_guide双路径生成玩法:判定形态 → L1/L2/L3 → 落参 → 生成。

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription
templates_resource单端候选注册表(自持 templates.yaml,薄菜单)。
combos_resource多端注册表视图(桥 list-combos 物化,只读)。

TDQS

C2.8/5.0

Scored across 6 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: list_templates and list_combos separately list single-end and multi-end options; get_template_params and get_combo_params separately introspect parameters; generate_single and generate_multi separately perform generation. The descriptions reinforce the single vs multi distinction, leaving no ambiguity about which tool to call for a given task.

Naming Consistency4/5

All names use snake_case with a consistent verb-first pattern (list_, get_, generate_) and parallel structure for single vs multi (templates/combos, template_params/combo_params). The only minor deviation is that generate_single and generate_multi use mode adjectives rather than nouns, but the set remains highly predictable.

Tool Count5/5

Six tools cleanly cover the two modalities (single-end and multi-end) with three operations each (list, get params, generate). This is well-scoped and every tool earns its place without redundancy.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers discovery, parameter introspection, and generation for both single and multi templates, forming a complete lifecycle for the bridge's purpose. Minor gaps exist: no standalone validation or preview tool, and list_combos lacks the filtering options that list_templates provides.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues