Skip to main content
Glama
jhauga
by jhauga

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-chat-cards

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to turn structured tabular data or CSV/XLSX files into interactive charts that render inline in conversations, with client-adaptive output modes and self-contained HTML.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets agents create, display, and export rich UI widgets (cards, dashboards, charts, forms) inline in conversations, with interactive iframe support in MCP Apps hosts and PNG image fallback for other clients.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Renders 45+ interactive chart types, dashboards, and KPI widgets directly inside AI conversations. Supports drill-down, live API polling, 20 themes, and one-click export to PNG, PowerPoint, and A4 documents.
      40
      156 npm
      48
      Functional Source , Version 1.1, MIT Future
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to ask users questions through rich, browser-rendered HTML forms and receive structured answers, supporting approvals, choices, free-text, and form inputs.
      195 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to render interactive charts as generative UI inline in chat, including bars, lines, areas, donuts, tooltips, table views, and built-in series analysis.
      -

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most card tools target clearly distinct visual formats, and the prompt-flow cards are explicitly staged. The only potential overlaps are create_tab_card vs create_code_tour_card and create_form_card vs mirror_web_form, but the descriptions provide enough detail to disambiguate.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: create_* for card renderers, fetch_/mirror_/submit_ for web actions, and read_/unpack_ for file access. Naming is predictable and scannable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Nineteen tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 well-scoped range, but each tool has a distinct purpose and the server covers a broad range of card types plus supporting utilities. It feels a bit heavy, though not bloated.

    Completeness5/5

    The set covers a wide range of card types, a complete three-step prompt workflow, local file inspection, web reference fetching, and mirrored form submission without obvious dead ends. Supporting tools feed cleanly into the card renderers, making workflows connected and practical.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues