Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to cursor-agent-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to launch and manage Cursor Cloud Agents on GitHub repos, including polling status, sending follow-ups, and reading conversations/PRs.
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coordinating Claude Code and Codex across separate Git worktrees with shared issue ownership, file reservations, messages, and explicit handoffs.
      1,015 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables delegating coding tasks to Cursor Cloud Agents from Claude Code, Codex, or Grok, with scoped repository access, progress monitoring, follow-ups, and result reporting.
      23
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: environment checks, model listing, worktree management, running tasks (including combined and parallel variants), applying changes, diffing, and job lifecycle management. While some tools like job_status, job_wait, and job_log overlap in domain, their descriptions clearly differentiate status, blocking wait, and log retrieval.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming is mixed: some tools use verb_noun (list_models, bring_changes), others use noun_verb (worktree_create, job_status), and a few are simple verbs (check, run, help, diff). The pattern is not consistent, though the names remain readable and domain-appropriate.

    Tool Count5/5

    16 tools is well-scoped for the purpose of orchestrating cursor-agent tasks in isolated worktrees with job management. Each tool serves a distinct role without redundancy, fitting comfortably within the 3-15 tool range.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full lifecycle: environment verification, model selection, worktree creation/listing/removal, task execution (single, combined, parallel), change review (diff), change application (bring_changes), and comprehensive job management (status, wait, log, list, cancel). There are no obvious gaps that would hinder the workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues