Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to bookmarks

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to organize and manage Chrome/Edge bookmarks through natural language, with user-controlled permissions, privacy filters, and safety mechanisms.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to save, search, and manage bookmarks with semantic search, automatic metadata extraction, and optional LLM-powered enrichment, all running locally.
      8
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to create annotated bookmarks and narrative trails to document code exploration and decision-making. It organizes these bookmarks into a navigable knowledge graph stored in a local JSON file, helping users track the context and reasoning behind code changes.
      1 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables semantic search across browser bookmarks from Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Opera, and other browsers using natural language queries. Extracts and indexes bookmark content and metadata into a vector database for intelligent retrieval.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables reading and writing Chrome bookmarks (folders, URLs, search, move, remove) through MCP clients like Claude Code, using a companion Chrome extension for secure local communication.
      11
      12 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables saving bookmarks, notes, and files from inside Claude Code or Codex and later finding them from any project or session just by describing what you remember. All storage, indexing, and natural-language search run locally via SQLite and a bundled embedding model, with no accounts, cloud, or API keys.
      5 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 25 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action (tree vs tabs vs search, snapshot vs snapshots vs restore). A few boundaries blur: read_this vs note both create notes, and group_tabs vs organize_tabs both group open tabs with different criteria, plus tabs vs tree both enumerate structure.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Conventions are heavily mixed: bare verbs (mkdir, move, trash, sort, add), vague nouns (inbox, tree, doctor, tabs, favicons, suggest), snake_case phrases (read_this, organize_tabs, open_folder_as_group), and a singularity/plurality pair (snapshot/snapshots). No predictable verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 25 tools the surface is heavy for a bookmarks manager, at the top of the 'heavy' band. Each tool does map to a plausible workflow, but several (snapshot/snapshots, group_tabs/organize_tabs/manage_group) could be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong: folder/link CRUD (mkdir, add, move, rename, trash), search, notes, tab grouping, health checks, and a full snapshot/restore lifecycle. Minor gap around editing a saved URL/title in place, but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues