Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to fast-gui

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for local browser control via Chrome/Edge extension, enabling agents to open isolated tabs, observe pages, take screenshots, and interact with accessible controls using an existing browser profile. It is agent-agnostic, local-only, and supports safe session scoping with origin grants and sensitive-data blocking.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that drives your real Chrome/Edge/Opera browser through a Chrome extension and DevTools Protocol, preserving logins and session state, and can also perform OS-level mouse and keyboard input behind approval.
      51
      46 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing and controlling multiple isolated Chrome/Edge browser instances, exposing tools for navigation, screenshots, clicking, form filling, and JavaScript execution to AI clients.
      3 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables remote agents to control a local Chrome/Edge browser via MCP, supporting navigation, snapshots, clicks, typing, screenshots, and script execution.
      14 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables browser automation over MCP using a real Chrome browser with existing profile, supporting real tabs, downloads, cookies, and RPA workflows.
      73 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The toolset mostly maps each tool to a distinct capability: navigation, observation, action, verification, capture, and page lifecycle are separated. However, `open_click_verify` and `act` can both be used for clicking, and `open_url`'s optional table/ref returns overlap with `extract_tables`, creating two possible mis-selection points despite helpful descriptions.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow an imperative verb + object snake_case pattern (`list_targets`, `close_target`, `open_url`, `extract_tables`, `wait_for`, `verify`). The pattern is weakened by noun-style names (`capabilities`, `price_radar`, `external_model_plan`) and the compound multi-verb `open_click_verify`, so consistency is only moderate.

    Tool Count4/5

    14 tools is a reasonable scope for a browser/GUI automation server and stays within the comfortable range. The count would be ideal if not for a couple of peripheral tools (`price_radar`, `external_model_plan`) that sit outside the core automation loop.

    Completeness4/5

    The core GUI automation lifecycle is well covered: open, observe, act (single and batch), wait/verify, capture, close, list targets, and safety introspection are all present. Minor gaps include the lack of a standalone input/typing tool and no explicit target reconciliation action, but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues