fast-gui
Related Servers
Alternatives to fast-gui
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for local browser control via Chrome/Edge extension, enabling agents to open isolated tabs, observe pages, take screenshots, and interact with accessible controls using an existing browser profile. It is agent-agnostic, local-only, and supports safe session scoping with origin grants and sensitive-data blocking.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that drives your real Chrome/Edge/Opera browser through a Chrome extension and DevTools Protocol, preserving logins and session state, and can also perform OS-level mouse and keyboard input behind approval.5146 PyPI1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for managing and controlling multiple isolated Chrome/Edge browser instances, exposing tools for navigation, screenshots, clicking, form filling, and JavaScript execution to AI clients.3 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables remote agents to control a local Chrome/Edge browser via MCP, supporting navigation, snapshots, clicks, typing, screenshots, and script execution.14 npmISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables browser automation over MCP using a real Chrome browser with existing profile, supporting real tabs, downloads, cookies, and RPA workflows.73 npmMIT
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables browser automation, including navigation, form filling, login with CAPTCHA handling, and element manipulation, using a Chrome-based MCP server.364-
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
The toolset mostly maps each tool to a distinct capability: navigation, observation, action, verification, capture, and page lifecycle are separated. However, `open_click_verify` and `act` can both be used for clicking, and `open_url`'s optional table/ref returns overlap with `extract_tables`, creating two possible mis-selection points despite helpful descriptions.
Most tools follow an imperative verb + object snake_case pattern (`list_targets`, `close_target`, `open_url`, `extract_tables`, `wait_for`, `verify`). The pattern is weakened by noun-style names (`capabilities`, `price_radar`, `external_model_plan`) and the compound multi-verb `open_click_verify`, so consistency is only moderate.
14 tools is a reasonable scope for a browser/GUI automation server and stays within the comfortable range. The count would be ideal if not for a couple of peripheral tools (`price_radar`, `external_model_plan`) that sit outside the core automation loop.
The core GUI automation lifecycle is well covered: open, observe, act (single and batch), wait/verify, capture, close, list targets, and safety introspection are all present. Minor gaps include the lack of a standalone input/typing tool and no explicit target reconciliation action, but agents can work around these.