Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ndlaw

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables retrieval of Iowa state statutes by citation with full text, amendment history, cross-references, and historical editions back to 2000, plus keyword search over the Code's official chapter and section captions. Also lists all 16 titles with their chapter ranges to route a subject to the right part of the code, all keyless.
      220 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to pull the full text of any state statute by citation, and to search official section catchlines by topic or keyword to find matching citations. Keyless, and handles citation suffixes such as "12.1-16-01" or "47-16-13.1".
      397 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables retrieval of New Jersey Statutes (N.J.S.A.) section text by citation, including parsed amendment history, plus keyword-based full-text topic search returning ranked sections with citation and heading. Keyless access to the state legislature's statute data.
      214 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to retrieve the full current text of any state statute section by citation, along with its amendment history, repealed/transferred status, neighboring sections, and any pending future-effective version. It also performs live full-text keyword search across actual section body text to find statutes by topic.
      270 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching U.S. Supreme Court cases by name, party, or docket; retrieving case metadata, decisions, vote breakdowns, and opinion announcements; and accessing oral-argument transcripts filtered down to a single Justice or advocate.
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 40 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Many tools overlap in purpose: multiple opinion search entry points (search_opinions, search_faceted, search_boolean, search_by_case_type), several citation/treatment verification tools (verify_citation vs get_parallel_citations, check_treatment vs get_citing_opinions vs check_draft vs detect_overruled_in_draft), and two provision-construing tools (find_opinions_construing vs get_notes_of_decisions). The detailed descriptions help, but an agent still faces real selection risk across 40 tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names are uniformly snake_case and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (get_*, search_*, lookup_*, verify_*). A few deviations (justice_info, case_summary, constitutional_amendments, more_like_this) are still readable and predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    40 tools is well above the ideal 3–15 range and lands in the 'too many' band for a single server. The breadth reflects multiple corpora (opinions, primary law, AG opinions, JEAC opinions, figures/tables), but the sheer count increases surface area and selection burden.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the legal-research lifecycle thoroughly: opinion search/retrieval, citation verification, treatment, quotation/pinpoint checks, authority lookup, history, cross-references, and dedicated AG/JEAC graphs, plus figures and tables. No obvious gaps for the stated ND-law domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues