redmine_get_role

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description discloses return content (permissions, visibility, assignability) and a version prerequisite. Without annotations, it's helpful but does not cover authorization, rate limits, or whether the operation is purely read-only. Adequate for a simple read tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no redundant words. The Alpha marker and version requirement are efficiently included. Front-loaded with purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one param, no output schema), the description covers what the tool returns and a key constraint. It does not describe return structure, but for a get-by-id tool, this is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter 'id' with no schema description. The description implies 'id' refers to a role ID through context, but does not explicitly define it or provide format/example. With 0% schema coverage, the description adds some value but not full compensation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses clear verb 'Get detailed information' specifying the resource 'role' and lists included details (permissions, visibility, assignability). It distinguishes from sibling 'redmine_list_roles' by implying granularity. The Alpha and version requirement add precision.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use instructions. While 'detailed' implies this is for specific role lookups after listing, no alternatives or exclusions are mentioned. The guidance is implicit from the sibling list but not stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.