Skip to main content
Glama
jestatsio

JEStats Screaming Frog Audit

by jestatsio

Related Servers

Alternatives to JEStats Screaming Frog Audit

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables local-first SEO evidence tooling by analyzing Screaming Frog exports, running bounded live and infrastructure checks, and producing structured audits, task backlogs, and reports via CLI and MCP.
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an AI agent to run and query self-hosted SEO crawls directly, returning findings grouped by check with evidence, stable issue ids, and a one-line fix ready to become tickets. Ships ten read-only-by-default, unmetered tools so a request to crawl a site and report what to fix comes back as actionable issues rather than a CSV.
      7
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to analyze Screaming Frog SEO Spider crawl files directly, offering SEO audits, issue summaries, custom SQL queries, and comparisons without manual exports.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive website SEO analysis including crawling, on-page audits, site structure visualization, and content topic classification with taxonomy mapping.
      7
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a fairly distinct role: lifecycle control (control_audit), diagnostics (connection_status), native crawl listing (list_crawls), job creation (start_audit), job listing (list_audits), progress polling (audit_status), findings querying (list_findings/finding_details), and reporting (render_report). The only mild overlap is between list_crawls vs list_audits and control_audit vs audit_status, but descriptions clearly separate control actions from status reconciliation.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are uniformly snake_case with mostly verb_noun or clear noun prefixes (list_crawls, start_audit, list_findings, render_report). A few are noun_status/noun_noun forms (connection_status, audit_status, finding_details), which is a minor deviation but still predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well-scoped for an audit lifecycle server, with each tool earning its place across connection, crawl listing, job management, findings, and reporting. No redundant or filler tools are apparent.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full audit lifecycle: connectivity diagnostics, native crawl enumeration, job creation/control/status, findings retrieval, and report rendering. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit export/download or findings export beyond render_report, no delete/cleanup of audit jobs), but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues