Skip to main content
Glama
jespermetahubb

apify-mcp-policy-gateway

Related Servers

Alternatives to apify-mcp-policy-gateway

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP gateway that applies deterministic, compiled policy to tool discovery, invocation, and outbound data flow, with no model in the enforcement path. Every decision emits a hash-chained receipt sealed with Ed25519 and verifiable using public keys only.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients and AI agents to discover and invoke only explicitly authorized, resource-bounded operational capabilities through a policy-enforced gateway with confirmation, audit, and isolated executor routing. It separates trusted transport identity from execution and supports declared tools over stdio MCP without exposing generic shell or privileged API surfaces.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables developers to wrap existing MCP servers with a deterministic policy enforcement gate that intercepts tool discovery and tools/call requests over stdio, allowing only authorized calls to reach the downstream server. It supports dynamic tool exposure or hiding, allow/deny/approval-required decisions, configurable error disclosure modes, and Ed25519-signed retry credentials for approved workflows.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a governed execution boundary for AI agents, enforcing deterministic policy, one-shot human approvals, and signed receipts for MCP tool effects.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool occupies a distinct lifecycle stage: plan, approve, execute, and read. There is no overlap in purpose, and the descriptions clearly differentiate the action and its constraints.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (plan_operation, approve_operation, execute_approved_operation, read_sanitized_results). The verbs are clear and the objects precisely describe the target, making the set predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for a policy gateway that manages a simple operation lifecycle. Each tool is necessary and the count feels intentional, not bloated or thin.

    Completeness4/5

    The lifecycle of plan-approve-execute-read is fully covered for the stated single owned fixture actor. A minor gap is the absence of a cancel or reject operation, but the given M1 context (no signed external approval mechanism) makes this an acceptable simplification for the bounded domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues