get_bookmark_assets

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are absent, so the description must disclose behavioral traits on its own. It merely states 'Get list' without detailing whether the operation is read-only, what happens for invalid bookmark IDs, or any resource restrictions. The lack of any side-effect or permission information leaves significant gaps, though the verb 'Get' does hint at a safe read operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that directly states the action and target without extraneous words. It is efficient and to the point.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (one parameter, an output schema that likely defines asset structure), the description captures the core functionality. However, it does not disambiguate this list operation from the singular 'get_bookmark_asset' or mention any ordering/pagination behaviors, so it is adequate but not fully comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter, bookmark_id, is already fully described in the schema as 'ID of the bookmark'. The description adds no new meaning beyond restating that the assets belong to a bookmark, so it offers no added value over the schema's existing documentation. Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline score is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Get' and identifies the resource as 'list of assets for a bookmark'. The plural 'assets' distinguishes it from the sibling tool 'get_bookmark_asset', which targets a single asset. The purpose is clear and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'get_bookmark_asset' or 'search_bookmarks'. There are no exclusions, prerequisites, or context hints, leaving the agent without direction for tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.