network_disable_intercept

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It only states the action without mentioning side effects, persistence, or whether it affects future or ongoing requests. For a toggle operation, more detail is expected.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, short sentence in Chinese that is concise and front-loaded with the verb. Every word is necessary and there is no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple toggle with no parameters and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks context about scope (e.g., global or per-request) and whether any prior enable is required. Given zero annotations, the description could be slightly more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters, and schema coverage is 100%, so the description does not need to add parameter details. The baseline of 4 is appropriate given no parameters exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb '关闭' (disable) and the resource '网络请求拦截' (network request interception), making the action unambiguous. It distinguishes itself from the sibling 'network_enable_intercept' which enables interception.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage context is provided. There is no guidance on when to disable interception, whether it should be preceded by enable, or any conditions. The sibling tool 'network_enable_intercept' implies a counterpart, but the description does not clarify usage scope or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.