Get a single entry

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

'Fetch' clearly signals a non-mutating read operation名家 and 'including its body text' gives useful behavioral detail about the response. It does not cover edge cases like missing ids or permissions, but for a simple single-entry read that is acceptable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single crisp sentence with the key information up front: the verb, the resource, the lookup key, and the main content type returned. No fluff or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter read operation, the description tells the agent what is returned and why id matters. It does not enumerate all possible fields or failure modes, but the tool is simple enough that this is not a major gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents id thoroughly, including where ids come from. The tool description adds no additional parameter-level meaning, which is fine because no extra detail is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies a specific operation: fetching one entry by its idhol. Mentioning 'full details' and 'body text' distinguishes it from search/list/capture operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use it—when an id is already known and full entry content is needed—but it does not explicitly contrast org_get_entry with siblings like org_search or explain when another tool would be more appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.