Skip to main content
Glama
jehadbaniodeh

boq-mcp

by jehadbaniodeh
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to boq-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • co.geztio/platform by geztio

      co.geztio/platformofficial

      geztio
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and manage construction project economic data, including unit price analyses, resource catalogs, budget trees, and price lists, with secure multi-tenant access.
      MIT

    • ACC AI MCP

      ssdotai
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Autodesk Construction Cloud projects through natural language, connecting APS APIs for querying project data and issues.
      -

    • ConstructAI

      bilalgit
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language querying of construction project data to analyze schedules, delays, critical activities, risks, and resource bottlenecks, and to generate schedule recovery recommendations.
      -

    • JoeMCP

      lumberjack-so
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to JoeAPI construction management system, enabling management of clients, contacts, proposals, estimates, action items, project schedules, and financial data through natural language.
      1
      -
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct resource/action: auth, hierarchical reads, creation, pricing costs, and contract/bill creation are clearly separated. The list_* and get_* read tools are distinguishable by level/aggregation, and create_* tools differ by target entity. No two tools appear to do the same job.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost all tools follow snake_case verb_noun conventions: list_projects, create_chapter, bulk_create_items, add_material_cost. Minor inconsistencies are login/whoami as standalone verbs and the mix of list_* for collections versus get_* for aggregate/singular reads, but the overall pattern is predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    19 tools is in the 16-25 range that feels heavy, though the BOQ domain spans hierarchy, pricing, and contracts so each tool has a distinct role. It is not egregiously over-scoped but exceeds the ideal 3-15 range for tight coherence.

    Completeness2/5

    The hierarchy has create/read coverage, but chapters/sections/items lack update/delete, and contractors/contracts/bills are write-only with no list/get tools. Pricing breakdown mentions labor/equipment/subcontracting, yet only material costs can be added. These gaps create dead ends for agents trying to verify or maintain created data.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources