Skip to main content
Glama
jegor377

mcp-dev-utils

by jegor377

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
format_jsonA

Format and validate a JSON string. Returns pretty-printed JSON or a clear error message.

generate_uuidA

Generate one or more random UUID v4 values.

base64_convertA

Encode a UTF-8 string to Base64 or decode a Base64 string back to text.

http_statusA

Look up an HTTP status code to get its name and description.

unix_timestampA

Convert a Unix timestamp (seconds since epoch) to a human-readable UTC datetime, or get the current time.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription
all_http_status_codesA reference list of all HTTP status codes known to this server.

TDQS

A4/5.0

Scored across 5 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: JSON formatting, UUID generation, Base64 conversion, HTTP status lookup, and timestamp conversion. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

Naming Consistency3/5

All names use snake_case, but the pattern is mixed: format_json and generate_uuid are verb_noun, while base64_convert is noun_verb and http_status/unix_timestamp are noun_noun. This inconsistency reduces predictability, though the names remain readable.

Tool Count5/5

With exactly 5 tools, the count is well within the ideal range for a focused utility server. Each tool earns its place and there is no bloat or feeling of insufficiency.

Completeness4/5

The set covers a reasonable spread of common developer utilities, but could be more comprehensive with additions like hashing or URL encoding. However, the current tools are self-contained and do not leave obvious dead ends.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues